Skip to main content

Conclusion: Enabling Alternative Urban Futures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enabling Urban Alternatives

Abstract

In order to draw conclusions emerging from the book as a whole, this chapter draws on findings from each of the preceding chapters to conduct a synthesising discussion. Organised around the same themes that comprise each part of the book, this discussion proceeds loosely according to the principles of relational comparison. It demonstrates the intricate ways in which thinking, governing, and performing the urban differently are mutually entwined in the differential production of urban space. It also shows how the different theoretical perspectives employed in the book can be made to complement each other in constructive ways that further better understandings of the ways in which alternative urban futures can be enabled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, I. (2004). A Performative Critique of the City: The Urban Practice of Skateboarding, 1957–98. In M. Miles, T. Hall, & I. Borden (Eds.), The City Cultures Reader (2nd ed., pp. 291–298). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the Urban Frontier: Temporary Uses of Space, City Marketing, and the Creative City Discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskalaki, M., & Mould, O. (2013). Beyond Urban Subcultures: Urban Subversions as Rhizomatic Social Formations. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (2010). The Uses of Neoliberalism. Antipode, 41(S1), 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002). The Archaeology of Knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2012). Continuous Institutional Innovation and the Pragmatic Conception of Democracy. Polity, 44(4), 609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. (2013) What Kind of Thing is ‘Neoliberalism’? New Formations 80/81. 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, N., & Rose, G. (2000). Taking Butler Elsewhere: Performativities, Spatialities and Subjectivities. Environment & Planning D, 18, 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the Outside. Essays on Virtual and Real Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2009). Teaching the Politics of Obesity: Insights into Neoliberal Embodiment and Contemporary Biopolitics. Antipode, 41(5), 1110–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. (2016). Relational Comparison Revisited: Marxist Postcolonial Geographies in Practice. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516681388

  • Harvey, D. (2006). The Limits to Capital (3rd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie, J. (2009). Theatre and the City. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis. Space, Time and Everyday Life. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould, O. (2015). Urban Subversion and the Creative City. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, M. (2014). Rancière and Revolution. Space and Polity, 18(2), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus. On Politics and Aesthetics (S. Corcoran, Ed. and Trans.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Kaae Fisker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fisker, J.K., Chiappini, L. (2019). Conclusion: Enabling Alternative Urban Futures. In: Fisker, J., Chiappini, L., Pugalis, L., Bruzzese, A. (eds) Enabling Urban Alternatives. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1531-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1531-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1530-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1531-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics