Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 5, 2023

Differential Treatment and Inequalities under the Sustainable Development Goals: Beyond Preferential Market Access

  • Johanna Aleria P. Lorenzo ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Reducing inequality in its multiple dimensions is key to sustainability. Under the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, one way to meet the goal of narrowing gaps between and within countries is by implementing the special and differential treatment (SDT) principle. The most concrete and well-established implementation of this principle within international trade law is through the Enabling Clause, which authorizes wealthy States to grant, under specified conditions, preferential market access to select developing countries. Yet commentators, consisting primarily of economists and developing-country representatives, argue that tariff preferences are often inadequate to grow the economies of many in the Global South, much less to reduce inequalities. A legal perspective that could bolster this argument remains sparse. This article fills said gap by explaining that while international trade law operationalizes the SDT principle with a heavy emphasis on tariff preferences, the principle is additionally expressed in several other provisions under the other World Trade Organization (WTO) covered agreements: Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade; Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures; Agreement on Trade Facilitation. These under-studied provisions demonstrate crucial but overlooked aspects of the SDT principle, namely, capacity-building and international assistance and cooperation. Therefore, critically analyzing these provisions is important to ascertain whether and how implementation of the SDT principle can reduce inequalities and support sustainable development. This legal analysis contributes in two ways to the broader inquiry about the role of international trade law in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). First, on a practical level, the article suggests legal bases or sources for additional indicators needed to better measure and monitor progress in reaching the target. Second, the analysis reveals a necessity to revisit and further scrutinize assumptions underlying the legal mechanisms within the trade regime that States and other relevant actors are using to pursue valuable global objectives.


Corresponding author: Johanna Aleria P. Lorenzo, Department of Public International and European Law, Amsterdam Center for International Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1000 BA, Netherlands, E-mail:

References

Adhikari, R., Targeting Aid for Trade for Impactful Capacity-Building in the Least Developed Countries, 10 Global Policy, no. 3 (2019), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12705>.Search in Google Scholar

AlModarra, B.B.M., The Special and Differential Treatment Provisions in the Trade Facilitation Agreement: New Teeth for an Old Gum?, 30 African Journal of International and Comparative Law, no. 2 (2022).10.3366/ajicl.2022.0401Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, E., Equality as a Global Goal, 30 Ethics & International Affairs, no. 2 (2016), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679416000071>.Search in Google Scholar

Anghie, A., Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order, 6 Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism and Development, no. 1 (2015).10.1353/hum.2015.0016Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R.E., Murray, T., MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits Under the GSP, 87 The Economic Journal, no. 345 (1977), available at: <https://doi.org/10.2307/2231831>.Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R.E., Murray, T., MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits Under the GSP: A Reply, 96 The Economic Journal, no. 382 (1986), available at: <https://doi.org/10.2307/2233133>.Search in Google Scholar

Bayar, Y., Sezgin, H.F., Trade Openness, Inequality and Poverty in Latin American Countries, 96 Ekonomika (2017), available at: <https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2017.1.10663>.Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, A.K., The Influence of the International Secretariat: UNCTAD and Generalized Tariff Preferences, 30 International Organization, no. 1 (1976).10.1017/S002081830000374XSearch in Google Scholar

Chang, S.W., WTO for Trade and Development Post-Doha, 10 Journal of International Economic Law, no. 3 (2007), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgm029>.Search in Google Scholar

Cho, S., The Demise of Development in the Doha Round Negotiations, 45 Texas International Law Journal, no. 3 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Choi, E.K., North–South trade and income inequality, 16 International Review of Economics & Finance, no. 3 (2007), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2006.02.001>.Search in Google Scholar

Corea, G., UNCTAD and the New International Economic Order, 53 International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), no. 2 (1977), available at: <https://doi.org/10.2307/2616999>.Search in Google Scholar

Cullet, P., “SDG 10: Reduce Inequality within and among Countries,” in: J. Ebbesson and E. Hey (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Sustainable Development Goals and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).10.1017/9781108769631.012Search in Google Scholar

Dann, P., The Law of Development Cooperation: A Comparative Analysis of the World Bank, the EU and Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).10.1017/CBO9781139097130Search in Google Scholar

Das, S.P., Gradual Globalization and Inequality between and within Countries, 38 The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique, no. 3 (2005).10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00305.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dorn, F., Fuest, C., Potrafke, N., Trade openness and income inequality: New empirical evidence, 60 Economic Inquiry, no. 1 (2022), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13018>.Search in Google Scholar

Ghose, A.K., Global inequality and international trade, 28 Cambridge Journal of Economics, no. 2 (2004), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/28.2.229>.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, J.L., Kowalski, P., Achard, P., Trade, global value chains and wage-income inequality (Paris: OECD, 2015), available by: <https://doi.org/10.1787/5js009mzrqd4-en>.Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, G.M., Sykes, A.O., A preference for development: the law and economics of GSP, 4 World Trade Review, no. 1 (2005), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745605002156>.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, A., McLaren, J., McMillan, M., Recent Perspectives on Trade and Inequality, 3 Annual Review of Economics, no. 1 (2011), available at: <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124451>.Search in Google Scholar

Hegde, V., Wouters, J., Special and Differential Treatment Under the World Trade Organization: A Legal Typology, 24 Journal of International Economic Law, no. 3 (2021).10.1093/jiel/jgab033Search in Google Scholar

Hoekman, B., Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment, 8 Journal of International Economic Law, no. 2 (2005).10.1093/jielaw/jgi027Search in Google Scholar

Huchet-Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C., Vijil, M., The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue, 41 The World Economy, no. 1 (2018).10.1111/twec.12586Search in Google Scholar

Irish, M., Development, Reciprocity and the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement, 14 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, no. 1 (2017).Search in Google Scholar

Irish, M., Special and Differential Treatment, Trade and Sustainable Development, 4 Law and Development Review, no. 2 (2011).10.2202/1943-3867.1075Search in Google Scholar

Ismail, F., Mainstreaming Development in the World Trade Organization, 39 Journal of World Trade, no. 1 (2005).10.54648/TRAD2005004Search in Google Scholar

Jouini, J., Linkage between international trade and economic growth in GCC countries: Empirical evidence from PMG estimation approach, 24 The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development (2015).10.1080/09638199.2014.904394Search in Google Scholar

Keck, A., Low, P., Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when and how?, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2004-03 (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2004).10.2139/ssrn.901629Search in Google Scholar

Kessie, E., “The Legal Status of Special and Differential Treatment Provisions under the WTO Agreements,” in G.A. Bermann and P.C. Mavroidis (eds.), WTO Law and Developing Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).10.1017/CBO9780511674518.002Search in Google Scholar

Lamy, P., The Place of the WTO and its Law in the International Legal Order, 17 European Journal of International Law, no. 5 (2006).10.1093/ejil/chl035Search in Google Scholar

Lewer, J.J., Van den Berg, H., How Large Is International Trade’s Effect on Economic Growth? 17 Journal of Economic Surveys, no. 3 (2003).10.1111/1467-6419.00198Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzo, J.A.P., SDG 10 “Reduce Inequality Within and Among Countries,” in I. Bantekas and F. Seatzu (eds.), The UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Commentary (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Low, P., “Special and differential treatment and developing country status: Can the two be separated?”, in B. Hoekman, Kong Qingjiang, Xinquan Tu, Dong Wang (eds.), Rebooting Multilateral Trade Cooperation: Perspectives from China and Europe (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Press, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Majeed, M.T., Economic growth, inequality and trade in developing countries, 15 International Journal of Development Issues, no. 3 (2016).10.1108/IJDI-02-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

Mayeda, G., Developing Disharmony? The SPS and TBT Agreements and the Impact of Harmonization on Developing Countries, 7 Journal of International Economic Law, no. 4 (2004).10.1093/jiel/7.4.737Search in Google Scholar

Michalopoulos, C., The Role of Special Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in GATT and the World Trade Organization, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2388 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2000).10.1596/1813-9450-2388Search in Google Scholar

Milanovic, B., Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Moon, G., Trade and Equality: A Relationship to Discover, 12 Journal of International Economic Law, no. 3 (2009).10.1093/jiel/jgp028Search in Google Scholar

Page, S., Kleen, P., Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization, Global Development Studies, No. 2. (London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI), 2005).Search in Google Scholar

Pomfret, R., MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits Under the GSP: A Comment, 96 The Economic Journal, no. 382 (1986).10.2307/2233132Search in Google Scholar

Prowse, S., The Role of International and National Agencies in Trade–related Capacity Building, 25 The World Economy, no. 9 (2002).10.1111/1467-9701.00490Search in Google Scholar

Ravallion, M., Inequality and Globalization: A Review Essay, 56 Journal of Economic Literature, no. 2 (2018).10.1257/jel.20171419Search in Google Scholar

Rodrik, D., A Primer on Trade and Inequality, The IFS Deaton Review (2021), available at: <https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/a_primer_on_trade_and_inequality.pdf>.10.3386/w29507Search in Google Scholar

Rolland, S.E., Development at the WTO (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Search in Google Scholar

Salomon, M.E., From NIEO to Now and the Unfinishable Story of Economic Justice, 62 International & Comparative Law Quarterly, no. 1 (2013).10.1017/S0020589312000590Search in Google Scholar

Salomon, M.E., Poverty, Privilege and International Law: The Millennium Development Goals and the Guise of Humanitarianism, 51 German Yearbook of International Law (2008).Search in Google Scholar

Santos-Paulino, A.U., Aid and Trade Sustainability under Liberalisation in Least Developed Countries, 30 The World Economy, no. 6 (2007).10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01040.xSearch in Google Scholar

Santos-Paulino, A.U., Trade Liberalisation and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence for Developing Countries, 28 The World Economy, no. 6 (2005).10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00707.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shaffer, G., Emerging Powers and the World Trading System: The Past and Future of International Economic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).10.1017/9781108861342Search in Google Scholar

Singh, T., Does International Trade Cause Economic Growth? A Survey, 33 The World Economy, no. 11 (2010).10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01243.xSearch in Google Scholar

Székely, M., Sámano, C., Did trade openness affect income distribution in Latin America? Evidence for the years 1980 – 2010, WIDER Working Paper No. 2012/03 (Helsinki: UNU-WIDER, 2012).Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, C., “The Death of Doha? Forensics of Democratic Governance, Distributive Justice, and Development in the WTO,” in C. Carmody, F.J. Garcia, & J. Linarelli (eds.), Global Justice and International Economic Law: Opportunities and Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).10.1017/CBO9781139003957.010Search in Google Scholar

Urata, S., Narjoko, D.A., International trade and inequality, ADBI Working Paper No. 675 (Tokyo: ADBI, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, R., First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?, 14 World Trade Review, no. 1 (2015).10.1017/S1474745614000342Search in Google Scholar

Wood, A., Ridao-Cano, C., Skill, trade, and international inequality, 51 Oxford Economic Papers, no. 1 (1999).10.1093/oep/51.1.89Search in Google Scholar

Zahonogo, P., Trade and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, 3 Journal of African Trade, no. 1 (2016).10.1016/j.joat.2017.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-06-05
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ldr-2023-0031/html
Scroll to top button