Concerns about the legitimacy and potential overextension of courts continually collide with demands for systemic change and critiques of the law’s inherent limitations in providing global climate justice. In this one-day workshop, bringing together academics and practitioners, we will explore some of the key questions that arise in this context.

Panels will discuss:

(i) how courts engage with, interpret, and base their findings on scientific evidence;

(ii) whether and how climate litigation can provide redistributive outcomes;

(iii) how the identification of overarching legal concepts and norms constitutionalizes states’ obligations in the climate emergency;

(iv) how objections to climate litigation rooted in the separation of powers can be understood and potentially overcome.

This conference is organised by Christina Eckes and Corina Heri.

Confirmed speakers

Justine Bendel (University of Copenhagen), Andrew Jackson (University College Dublin), Kelly Matheson (Global Climate Litigation), Sarah Mead (Urgenda), Phillip Paiement (Tilburg University), Lea Raible (University of Glasgow), Annalisa Savaresi (University of Eastern Finland), Nele Schuldt (Ghent University), Wim Thiery (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh (University of Amsterdam), Gerd Winter (University of Bremen)